<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chris Anderson’s Free Contains Apparent Plagiarism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vqronline.org/blog/2009/06/23/chris-anderson-free/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vqronline.org/blog/2009/06/23/chris-anderson-free/</link>
	<description>A National Blog of Literature &#38; Discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 00:47:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: letters and sodas: booknotes &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Free: The Future of a Radical Price by Chris AndersonHyperion, 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.vqronline.org/blog/2009/06/23/chris-anderson-free/#comment-3306</link>
		<dc:creator>letters and sodas: booknotes &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Free: The Future of a Radical Price by Chris AndersonHyperion, 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vqronline.org/blog/?p=2419#comment-3306</guid>
		<description>[...] even after reading Malcolm Gladwell&#8217;s not-too-enthusiastic review in the New Yorker, and the plagiarism accusations in VQR (which I got to via TeleRead), and even Virginia Postrel&#8217;s review, in which she calls Free [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] even after reading Malcolm Gladwell&#8217;s not-too-enthusiastic review in the New Yorker, and the plagiarism accusations in VQR (which I got to via TeleRead), and even Virginia Postrel&#8217;s review, in which she calls Free [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lined &#38; Unlined &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Some thoughts on Free</title>
		<link>http://www.vqronline.org/blog/2009/06/23/chris-anderson-free/#comment-3299</link>
		<dc:creator>Lined &#38; Unlined &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Some thoughts on Free</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 16:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vqronline.org/blog/?p=2419#comment-3299</guid>
		<description>[...] would normally be the point in the review where I obligingly share with the reader that portions of Anderson&#8217;s book were mistakenly plagarized from Wikipedia. Anderson has already apologized for what I think was an honest mistake, and he&#8217;s corrected [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] would normally be the point in the review where I obligingly share with the reader that portions of Anderson&#8217;s book were mistakenly plagarized from Wikipedia. Anderson has already apologized for what I think was an honest mistake, and he&#8217;s corrected [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free Chris Anderson! - Randale C. Sechrest, MD</title>
		<link>http://www.vqronline.org/blog/2009/06/23/chris-anderson-free/#comment-3296</link>
		<dc:creator>Free Chris Anderson! - Randale C. Sechrest, MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 13:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vqronline.org/blog/?p=2419#comment-3296</guid>
		<description>[...] book has caused quite a bit of discussion for a multitude of reasons - most notably the claim of plagarism. So far, I come down on the side of those who agree with the basic argument that Anderson is making [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] book has caused quite a bit of discussion for a multitude of reasons &#8211; most notably the claim of plagarism. So far, I come down on the side of those who agree with the basic argument that Anderson is making [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free &#124; slouch magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.vqronline.org/blog/2009/06/23/chris-anderson-free/#comment-3293</link>
		<dc:creator>Free &#124; slouch magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 23:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vqronline.org/blog/?p=2419#comment-3293</guid>
		<description>[...] artists are up in arms, not only with the book and its premise, but also with Anderson&#8217;s liberal use of Wikipedia material and comments he&#8217;s made in public concerning his views on if/how and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] artists are up in arms, not only with the book and its premise, but also with Anderson&#8217;s liberal use of Wikipedia material and comments he&#8217;s made in public concerning his views on if/how and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sneering At Chris Anderson&#8217;s Free is Overblown &#124; INDEX // mb</title>
		<link>http://www.vqronline.org/blog/2009/06/23/chris-anderson-free/#comment-3292</link>
		<dc:creator>Sneering At Chris Anderson&#8217;s Free is Overblown &#124; INDEX // mb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 22:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vqronline.org/blog/?p=2419#comment-3292</guid>
		<description>[...] when Anderson published his initial thesis in Wired. And I am saying this as someone that mocked Anderson&#8217;s wikipedia copying, and I noted the push back from professor Richard Muller and relished Janet Maslin&#8217;s diss in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] when Anderson published his initial thesis in Wired. And I am saying this as someone that mocked Anderson&#8217;s wikipedia copying, and I noted the push back from professor Richard Muller and relished Janet Maslin&#8217;s diss in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Book Blog - Likely Stories, by Keir Graff - Booklist Online &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What I Haven&#8217;t Been Writing About</title>
		<link>http://www.vqronline.org/blog/2009/06/23/chris-anderson-free/#comment-3291</link>
		<dc:creator>Book Blog - Likely Stories, by Keir Graff - Booklist Online &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What I Haven&#8217;t Been Writing About</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vqronline.org/blog/?p=2419#comment-3291</guid>
		<description>[...] the Virginia Quarterly Review&#8217;s blog, the excellently monikered Waldo Jaquith noted that Wired Editor-in-Chief Chris Anderson, the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Virginia Quarterly Review&#8217;s blog, the excellently monikered Waldo Jaquith noted that Wired Editor-in-Chief Chris Anderson, the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry &#187; Archive &#187; Two Critiques of Two Kinds of ‘Free’</title>
		<link>http://www.vqronline.org/blog/2009/06/23/chris-anderson-free/#comment-3289</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry &#187; Archive &#187; Two Critiques of Two Kinds of ‘Free’</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 19:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vqronline.org/blog/?p=2419#comment-3289</guid>
		<description>[...] Commons license (though only until the shipping date of the $27 printed version), was recently shown to have plagiarized at least seven different Wikipedia articles (often in large swathes) in writing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Commons license (though only until the shipping date of the $27 printed version), was recently shown to have plagiarized at least seven different Wikipedia articles (often in large swathes) in writing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Le blogue de Marie-Claude Ducas &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Free, de Chris Anderson : duel de gourous et histoire de plagiat</title>
		<link>http://www.vqronline.org/blog/2009/06/23/chris-anderson-free/#comment-3282</link>
		<dc:creator>Le blogue de Marie-Claude Ducas &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Free, de Chris Anderson : duel de gourous et histoire de plagiat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vqronline.org/blog/?p=2419#comment-3282</guid>
		<description>[...] a été question du sujet dans des blogues et des médias. Signalons seulement que c&#8217;est le Virginia Quarterly Review qui a attaché le grelot, et que les articles de The blog herald et de Fast Company  font partie de [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a été question du sujet dans des blogues et des médias. Signalons seulement que c&#8217;est le Virginia Quarterly Review qui a attaché le grelot, et que les articles de The blog herald et de Fast Company  font partie de [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plagiarism, Academic Integrity, Intellectual Property - Read, Think, Write (Repeat)</title>
		<link>http://www.vqronline.org/blog/2009/06/23/chris-anderson-free/#comment-3281</link>
		<dc:creator>Plagiarism, Academic Integrity, Intellectual Property - Read, Think, Write (Repeat)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vqronline.org/blog/?p=2419#comment-3281</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Chris Anderson’s Free Contains Apparent Plagiarism,&#8221; by Waldo Jaquith &#124; Virginia Quarterly Review (23 June 2009). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Chris Anderson’s Free Contains Apparent Plagiarism,&#8221; by Waldo Jaquith | Virginia Quarterly Review (23 June 2009). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can Hyperbole Generate $50,000 Corporate Speaking Engagements? &#124; Internet Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.vqronline.org/blog/2009/06/23/chris-anderson-free/#comment-3271</link>
		<dc:creator>Can Hyperbole Generate $50,000 Corporate Speaking Engagements? &#124; Internet Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 03:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vqronline.org/blog/?p=2419#comment-3271</guid>
		<description>[...] rewrite and/or directly plagiarizes it, and then wrap it in Wikipedia goodness. Unsurprisingly, the book Free re-wrapped a lot of Wikipedia in a hardcover and sold it for $27 (without attribution, naturally). Copyfraud for the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rewrite and/or directly plagiarizes it, and then wrap it in Wikipedia goodness. Unsurprisingly, the book Free re-wrapped a lot of Wikipedia in a hardcover and sold it for $27 (without attribution, naturally). Copyfraud for the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

