<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Every Book Deserve a Review?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vqronline.org/blog/2009/07/04/review-every-book/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vqronline.org/blog/2009/07/04/review-every-book/</link>
	<description>A National Blog of Literature &#38; Discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 02:12:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Book Review Meritocracy &#171; SONYA CHUNG</title>
		<link>http://www.vqronline.org/blog/2009/07/04/review-every-book/#comment-3243</link>
		<dc:creator>Book Review Meritocracy &#171; SONYA CHUNG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vqronline.org/blog/?p=2453#comment-3243</guid>
		<description>[...] Silverman&#8217;s article here.     Posted by sonyachung Filed in book biz, media, reviews Tags: Jacob Silverman, Lauren Conrad   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Silverman&#8217;s article here.     Posted by sonyachung Filed in book biz, media, reviews Tags: Jacob Silverman, Lauren Conrad   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Second Pass</title>
		<link>http://www.vqronline.org/blog/2009/07/04/review-every-book/#comment-3236</link>
		<dc:creator>The Second Pass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 12:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vqronline.org/blog/?p=2453#comment-3236</guid>
		<description>[...] Jacob Silverman notes that a staggering 275,000 or so new titles were published last year, and wonders how we should decide which books get reviewed. He’s pretty sure that Lauren Conrad’s L.A. Candy deserves to be ignored. Yet Salon recently [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jacob Silverman notes that a staggering 275,000 or so new titles were published last year, and wonders how we should decide which books get reviewed. He’s pretty sure that Lauren Conrad’s L.A. Candy deserves to be ignored. Yet Salon recently [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PHM</title>
		<link>http://www.vqronline.org/blog/2009/07/04/review-every-book/#comment-3230</link>
		<dc:creator>PHM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 23:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vqronline.org/blog/?p=2453#comment-3230</guid>
		<description>You could be right on, but then again, I feel like there&#039;s no room for negative reviews anymore because everybody&#039;s in denial about the fact that nobody wants to buy their books. So when someone gets a negative review they go animal these days and get more publicity for it than they got by getting thrashed in a review. It&#039;s happened twice in recent memory and might be a new trend. It&#039;s all madness, really. I&#039;m not sure why I even review books ever. Not even because I want to help friends out. Maybe it&#039;s because I want to feel like my opinion is important. Anyways, everybody&#039;s always got something to say about NYT. I don&#039;t remember the last time I heard a civilian--someone not literary in nature--mention anything about an actual NYT review. I&#039;m also not sure how much that bestseller list means anymore. Maybe I&#039;m bitter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could be right on, but then again, I feel like there&#8217;s no room for negative reviews anymore because everybody&#8217;s in denial about the fact that nobody wants to buy their books. So when someone gets a negative review they go animal these days and get more publicity for it than they got by getting thrashed in a review. It&#8217;s happened twice in recent memory and might be a new trend. It&#8217;s all madness, really. I&#8217;m not sure why I even review books ever. Not even because I want to help friends out. Maybe it&#8217;s because I want to feel like my opinion is important. Anyways, everybody&#8217;s always got something to say about NYT. I don&#8217;t remember the last time I heard a civilian&#8211;someone not literary in nature&#8211;mention anything about an actual NYT review. I&#8217;m also not sure how much that bestseller list means anymore. Maybe I&#8217;m bitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
